Field method
How we survey
Every recommendation starts with research, not marketing pages. This sheet is the full method: how we collect, benchmark, and score.
Two ways to draw a map
Most review sites
- Start with the product features
- Quote the marketing page
- Give everyone 4.5 stars
- Rank by commission amount
This survey
- Start with real user feedback
- Analyze thousands of data points
- Scores vary because quality varies
- Match alternatives to your specific needs
The method, six stations
- 01
We collect complaints at scale
We cross reference G2, Trustpilot, and Capterra reviews (490,000+ total) alongside Reddit discussions, Twitter threads, and software forums. When G2 rates Salesforce 4.4/5 but Trustpilot shows 1.5/5, that gap reveals billing problems no marketing page will mention.
- 02
We survey the benchmarks
We compile TTFB response times, uptime percentages, deliverability rates, and load test performance from published testing. Hosting tools get server benchmarks. Email tools get inbox placement rates. CRM tools get pipeline and mobile app ratings. Specific numbers, not adjectives.
- 03
We score 0 to 10 from the evidence
Each tool is scored 0 to 10 based on benchmarks, review platform scores, pricing fairness, and feature depth. Our ratings range from 5.3 (Constant Contact) to 8.3 (Kinsta) because quality actually varies. Renewal pricing tricks and hidden fees lower scores.
- 04
We match routes to terrain
We match you with alternatives based on what you need most. Slow TTFB? We recommend hosts with measured sub 200ms response times. Bad deliverability? We point to platforms with 94%+ inbox placement rates.
- 05
We publish the evidence with the pick
Every recommendation cites specific data: pricing tiers with intro and renewal splits, G2, Trustpilot, and Capterra scores with review counts, and performance benchmarks. No tool is perfect, and we show exactly where each one falls short.
- 06
We resurvey when the ground moves
Scores are not permanent. SiteGround's TTFB degraded 57% between 2022 and 2025 and their score dropped from 8.5 to 7.1. We track performance continuously and update recommendations when the data changes.
The master legend
Every mark that can appear on a SwitchCut sheet, decoded once. A page carries a legend box listing only the marks on that sheet; the wording comes from this dictionary and never changes.
Legend · every mark on this sheet
- Benchmark triangle: surveyed score
- Filled benchmark triangle: top pick score
- Go green diamond: recommended path
- Hazard red flag: renewal hazard
- Dashed brown line: route
- Waypoint dot: migration step
- Square waypoint: route start
- Surveyor pin: current position on the route
- Diagonal hatch: recommended fit
- Cross hatch: avoid
- Confidence stipple: evidence weight
- Depression sink: renewal trap
- Bog: hard to migrate out
- Cultivated grid: transparent pricing
- Halftone relief: terrain shading (plates only)
- Dashed trail underline: link
Where the observations come from
We pull from multiple platforms to avoid bias toward any single community.
What we do not do
- Fabricate benchmarks or test results
- Rank providers by commission amount
- Accept payment for placement or higher scores
- Use fake user quotes or testimonials
- Give every host 4.5 stars to avoid offending anyone
- Hide the real costs or renewal pricing
Survey note: some links on this site are affiliate links and we earn a commission if you sign up. It never moves a benchmark. Read the full disclosure